Restorative and transformative justice system in Seattle

logo Latest in a series of posts responding to the George Floyd killing logo

Reprinted in today’s Morning Call. Apropos of Gadfly’s train of thought over the last several posts, thanks to Mr. Crownfield.

from Naomi Ishisaka, “Envision a criminal legal system that doesn’t throw people away.” Seattle Times, July 13, 2020.

Our existing system of criminalization and mass incarceration is not working, by any measure.

These poor outcomes are leading more and more people to look at community-based alternatives to the legal system and incarceration, such as restorative and transformative justice.

Restorative and transformative justice practices are not new. Indigenous cultures around the world have practiced some form of restorative justice for millennia, rooted in the belief that no matter what a person may have done, none are disposable. More recently, efforts to extract ourselves from our current failed system of punishment and retribution have led to more interest in how those principles could be more widely implemented.

In a nutshell, restorative justice looks at incidents and harm between people. It asks who was harmed and how to address and rectify the harm and requires participants to take accountability.

Transformative justice seeks accountability but also looks at underlying conditions and social structures that created the conditions for harmful behavior and works to change or transform them to prevent future harm.

How could transformative justice work in practice? Seattle’s Creative Justice program provides an example.

Creative Justice started in 2015 as an arts-based approach to end youth incarceration and the dramatic racial disproportionality in youth detention. Co-directed by attorney and community organizer Nikkita Oliver and lead engagement artist Aaron Counts, the program uses art as an alternative to incarceration.

Why? Because incarceration doesn’t help young people, Counts said, nor does it make communities safer.

With a majority of the city council now pledging to support defunding the Seattle police by 50%, we have an opportunity to invest in different solutions. We can take a transformative approach and tackle some of the root causes of crime, such as generational poverty, housing instability and unequal education, as we overhaul the legal system at the same time. In fact we must, because there is no “them,” there is only “us.”

Detroit Mayor: “Restorative practices will make our city safe”

logo Latest in a series of posts about the Bethlehem Police logo

International Institute for Restorative Practices
531 Main St.

———–

from
2018 IIRP World Conference: Strengthening the spirit of community

“Restorative practices will make our city safe,” Mayor Mike Duggan declared in the opening session. “Neighborhood police officers are working seamlessly with community block clubs and Detroit Public Schools,” added Todd Bettison, Deputy Chief of Police, who’s been trained in restorative practices himself. “It’s making a huge difference. Formerly challenging kids are now leaders.”

Two school superintendents confirmed the district’s adherence to the practices. Tonya Allen, President and CEO of the Skillman Foundation, stated, “Skillman is supporting training for teachers, police, courts and neighborhood organizations.” High school sophomore and Restorative Practices Ambassador, Faith Howard, vowed, “Change starts with me!” Her schoolmate and fellow Ambassador, Jordan Cook, agreed: “I’m the one who tells kids: You can do it!”

The scope of restorative practices across the city was highlighted in numerous sessions. Michigan’s Third Judicial Circuit Court, the largest in the state, is employing the practices institution-wide, with 331 of 498 staff trained to date. With buy-in from top leadership, the initiative is building strong staff connections and resolving workplace tensions and conflict. Staff are also using the practices with clients and family. “Since people who work at the court are part of the community, it will affect the whole community,” observed Benita Cheatom, Executive Director of Human Resources and Labor Relations.

“Restorative practices is the model; Circle Keepers are the movement,” stated Derek Blackmon, Black Family Development, Inc. Project Director for Safety Initiatives. Trained to use restorative practices in homes, families, block clubs and everywhere, Circle Keepers help resolve issues all over the city. They meet monthly with hundreds of community members, joined by neighborhood police. To fight neighborhood crime, Circle Keepers led a series of “peace marches.” They’ve persuaded 300 business owners to become “green-light” establishments, with cameras that connect to the police department. “We asked them to be part of our community,” Derek explains. “They came to our meetings and became our partners.”

———

Much on the program of this conference of interest.

See, for example:

Police-Community Reconciliation as a Framework to Build Trust and Increase Public Safety

A model: Police Community Summits in Detroit

logo Latest in a series of posts about the Bethlehem Police logo

Restorative justice in Detroit
https://www.metrotimes.com/detroit/restorative-justice-in-detroit/Content?oid=9697360

International Institute for Restorative Practices
531 Main St.

from Larry Gabriel, “Restorative justice in Detroit.” Detroit Metro Times, February 28, 2018.

There are a lot of things going on in Detroit aimed at changing the status quo, fixing things up and all that. One of the less visible efforts that could make the biggest difference is fixing people and their relationships through restorative practices.

This isn’t a headline-grabbing effort. Most of the headlines are grabbed by the things that show that we need restorative practices. When there’s a shooting or a fight, that’s news. When people sit down and discuss their issues and come to an agreement… well, that’s pretty boring. So it would be the goal of Henry McClendon Jr., Michigan regional representative of the International Institute for Restorative Practices [headquarters Bethlehem], to bore you out of your mind at news time.

“More people are embracing it now,” says McClendon, who works with schools, Detroit Police and the organization Black Family Development, among others.

Detroit Police seem to be at least giving it a hug — and not one of those quickie bro hugs. He’s been doing a series of Police Community Summits, so far in the 5th, 7th and 10th precincts. These six-hour sessions seem to be sincere efforts. They started in the 5th and Police Chief James Craig was impressed enough that he ordered that all precincts participate in them. A fifth summit will take place early in March.

“The concept is to give a voice to the citizens who may or may not have good feelings about police officers,” says Commander Eric Ewing of the 5th Precinct. “It’s a two-pronged approach that gives an opportunity to see what the other is going through. In the end we get a better working relationship between officers and the community based on a better understanding.”

One part of the practice is for police in plainclothes and community members to socialize together at the beginning of the summit without identifying the officers. The uniform barrier is removed and citizens can get to know them with fewer preconceived notions. Early in the six-hour summit the officers are identified.

“Once we get into it, citizens are shocked to see who the officers are,” says Ewing.

A better understanding is what we all need around here. And around here could be anywhere from your block, to southeast Michigan, to the United States, to the entire planet. Better understanding might be the key to a lot of things. In that spirit the IIRP World Conference, Strengthening the Spirit of Community, will take place in Detroit in October 24 to 26.

Goals of restorative practices include reducing crime, violence, and bullying, improving human behavior, strengthening civil society, repairing harm, and more. Restorative justice, which some folks may have heard about, is considered a subset of restorative practices.

A model: Restorative Justice in Detroit

logo Latest in a series of posts about the Bethlehem Police logo

Restorative justice in Detroit
https://www.metrotimes.com/detroit/restorative-justice-in-detroit/Content?oid=9697360

International Institute for Restorative Practices
531 Main St.

Patiently but indefatigably, Peter Crownfield has been peppering us with comments reprinted below, but comments that might not have been fully appreciated.

Let’s take a look at restorative justice in Detroit, facilitated by a local Bethlehem organization.

Anna Smith has suggested that an initiative be headed by someone outside City government. Gadfly has suggested doing what we are doing with the Climate Action Plan.

Worth thinking about.

———–

1) List of members suggest a typical government-community committee. If they want to see actual community engagement, they need to be transparent about what they discuss. Perhaps they could start by beginning to organize a series of police community summits like they did in Detroit:

  • Restorative justice in Detroit   [www.metrotimes.com/detroit/restorative-justice-in-detroit/Content?oid=9697360]

2) Not to beat a dead horse, but I want to repeat what I have said more than once: I think the one of the most effective ways to develop real police-community engagement would be to use a process similar to the police-community summits held in Detroit a couple of years ago — a series of in-depth meetings throughout the city. I’ve worked with several cohorts of students exploring the idea of Community-Based & Restorative Justice, and they were quite impressed by this process. Here’s some newspaper coverage:

  • Restorative justice in Detroit | Detroit Metro
    [https://www.metrotimes.com/detroit/restorative-justice-in-detroit/Content?oid=9697360]

3) Two approaches to having trained professionals take over MH cases would, potentially, involve diverting work and funds from policing — Austin TX has mental-health paramedics; Eugene OR teams with community organization to do similar things. Both can be dispatched by 911 call center.

  • 911 Services That Dispatch Mental Health Counselors, Not Cops, Gain Traction
    [https://truthout.org/articles/911-services-that-dispatch-mental-health-counselors-not-cops-gain-traction/]
  • Community Groups Work to Provide Emergency Medical Alternatives, Separate From Police [http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/32782-community-groups-work-to-provide-emergency-medical-alternatives-separate-from-police]

4) On the matter of experts, though, I’d like to see someone from IIRP, someone who was involved in the police-community summits in Detroit.

5) Community engagement — See my previous comments on other posts. No committee, task force, or meeting can come anywhere near real community engagement. What we need is an approach that is deeper and more open, like the one developed in Detroit. This would be comparable, in many ways, to the ‘truth and reconciliation’ processes we’ve seen elsewhere.

6) I didn’t get to add that the best sort of process would be similar to what they did in Detroit a couple of years ago — a series of police-community summits in the various policing districts. This is real community engagement!

  • Restorative justice in Detroit | Detroit Metro Times
    [https://www.metrotimes.com/detroit/restorative-justice-in-detroit/Content?oid=9697360]

7) I think the whole police-community engagement idea would be best served by a process like the police-community summits held in Detroit a couple of years ago. I’ll see if I can get more detailed info from IIRP [International Institute for Restorative Practices].

  • Restorative justice in Detroit | Detroit Metro Times [https://www.metrotimes.com/detroit/restorative-justice-in-detroit/Content?oid=9697360]

(Since they are based right here in Bethlehem, maybe we could prevail on them to help!)

BLM proposal to Allentown City Council includes Citizen Review Board

logo Latest in a series of posts responding to the George Floyd killing logo

From the Black Lives Matter Lehigh Valley Facebook page: Below is a resolution that will be brought before Allentown City Council on Wednesday that addresses many of the specific demands we made at Monday’s protest.

Resolved by the Council of the City of Allentown, That

WHEREAS, Allentown City Council is committed to a dialogue that includes examining police operations, legislative and community oversight, requiring certain reporting requirements and establishing a policy on force; and

WHEREAS, Allentown City Council supports along with the Human Relations Commission the Eight Can’t Wait recommendations from the Obama administration related to the use of police force; and

WHEREAS, City Council will meet on Wednesday, July 29, 2020 at 6:00 PM to begin to take public comment and work on recommendations for policing in Allentown; and

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Allentown will foster a dialogue inclusive of but not limited to reviewing, discussing and adopting some of the following:

Making Body cam usage mandatory – if not used then face discipline including termination;

Require that Allentown Police Department (APD) inform council of any changes to the Civil Rights, discipline and use of force policies and that if any of those changes effect adherence to 8 Can’t Wait, and if there are any changes council must vote on the change;

Explicitly adopt of policy that no knock warrants are banned;

Remove any exceptions for chokehold and neck restraints from the use of force policy;

Explicitly state that stop and frisk is banned;

Explicitly state that officers have a duty to intervene in any excessive use of force and that there are discipline consequences including termination for not doing so;

Establish by legislation a Citizens Review Board that reviews among other things for cases of excessive force and when a weapon is discharged;

Require Bi-annual reports of use of force, discipline, positive interactions, policy changes and types of calls/responses that are disaggregated by race and gender to be given and discussed at Council’s Public Safety at a public meeting.

Provide that misuse of force situations are immediately given to the attorney general (3rd party);

Officers who are suspected of violating the use of force policy and are under investigation are immediately placed on suspension while the investigation is conducted, this should be automatic, so the public has peace of mind and officers have accountability;

A quarterly reporting requirement that contains a breakdown of the nature of calls in Allentown, i.e. reason for call: mental health, domestic disturbance, violent crime, traffic accident, and an annual report. The report should be made public immediately following their release;

Make body camera footage available to the public and easily accessible with no delays in its release;

Begin to draft a plan of divestment of resources currently allocated to the police department to other areas or sectors of the city such as mental health, housing, drug & alcohol treatment,social services, etc;

Mandatory community meetings following use of force incidents to contend with the psychological ramifications and fear that emerges from the use of lethal use of force and force community concerns to be fielded and responded to.

Be It Also Resolved that City Council Effectuate such recommendations through legislative action as possible through amending your code or asking legislators to change.

Be it Finally Resolved that these recommendations be considered and reviewed no later than three months after passage of this resolution.

Allentown incident “a reflection of a warrior model of policing”

logo Latest in a series of posts responding to the George Floyd killing logo

You can see the full 9-minute video here.

from Daniel Patrick Sheehan and Manuel Gamiz, Jr. “Did Allentown police do anything wrong in video that sparked protests?” Morning Call, July 14, 2020.

When Kutztown University criminal justice professor Arthur Garrison saw the video of Allentown police officers struggling to subdue a man Saturday outside a hospital, what caught his attention wasn’t an officer’s knee on the man’s head but the indifference the officers displayed toward a man who clearly needed help.

“It is clear the police were interested in control of the man, not providing medical aid as a primary goal,” he said. “So the use of force follows. It’s a reflection of a warrior model of policing where the first thing is domination and control.”

“They were at the entrance of the emergency room and they see a man vomit in the street and need help and they just stand there watching him,” Garrison said. “They did not immediately rush to provide aid. Their indifference was the first thing that struck me.”

According to court documents posted Tuesday, Edward Borrero Jr., 37, of Allentown, was charged with possession of drug paraphernalia and disorderly conduct, both misdemeanors, as well as a summary offense of public drunkenness. It does not appear that he was taken into custody.

The cellphone video brought an immediate response from protesters, who marched Saturday night to a police substation at 10th and Hamilton streets, demanding answers. On Monday night, they were joined by hundreds of others, who called for the officer’s arrest and the defunding of the department.

Emanuel Kapelsohn, an Allentown consultant who teaches firearm and use-of-force techniques to police and helps agencies craft use-of-force policies, said it was no surprise that the Allentown video, a distressing echo of the Floyd arrest, sparked outrage and protests.

Kapelsohn said he was as appalled as anyone at Floyd’s slow asphyxiation under the knee of a Minneapolis police officer. But what happened in Allentown was distinctly different, he said.

“I don’t see anything wrong,” he said, of the placement of the Allentown officer’s knee. Kapelsohn — an attorney and reserve deputy sheriff who has been an expert witness in state and federal use-of-force trials — said the positioning of the officer’s knee, which lasted about eight seconds, didn’t constitute a neck restraint, which is banned by Allentown’s use-of-force policy, and posed no risk of cutting off the man’s air supply or the blood flow to his brain.

The events leading to the struggle are important to consider in judging what happened, he added.“ This was someone obviously in some kind of distress,” Kapelsohn said. “The police and hospital personnel are coming to help and that’s for his benefit, not theirs.”

Garrison — the Kutztown professor whose book “Chained to the System: History and Politics of Black Incarceration in America” comes out next month — said he saw more issues before the officer placed a knee on the man’s head.

“He wasn’t threatening, and that’s the issue that you look at when you look at police use of force,” he said. “When the cops came at him, he got on his knees and was submissive and the first thing they did was reach for their handcuffs, not see what was wrong with him.

“There’s two ways police see the world, either a warrior model or a guardian model,” which he said is a policing mindset focused on protecting citizens.

Another thing Garrison found interesting about the video was seeing two hospital staff members wave away a car that was slowing down as it passed the encounter, blocking the view of the police restraining the man.

“The nurses first engage by protecting the police,” he said. “Only when he is handcuffed do the nurses provide any attention and place some kind of hood over his head. Then they finally walk him to the emergency room.”

Kapelsohn said the reaction to the video is understandable because of what he called hypersensitivity in the wake of the Floyd killing.

In that case, he said, “that officer seems to be torturing him.”

Garrison said that while the knee to the man’s head and neck was brief, “you would think in the post-Floyd world, the officer would not have done such a thing.”

“If you have your knee to somebody’s neck, on concrete, he’s not going anywhere and that’s the point of domination and control,” he said. “It’s this kind of attitude and approach that can lead to a man dead under the police knee.”

Community Advisory Board discusses police use of force policy

logo Latest in a series of posts about the Bethlehem Police logo

On the City Facebook page: “Last evening we kicked off the first monthly meeting of the Community Advisory Board — sponsored by the local NAACP and President Lee — with Mayor Donchez and 23 members of the community participating. The city’s Use of Force Policy and the responsibilities of the city’s professional standards unit were discussed.‬”

As of 8am this morning, there were two comments to the post: “Was this a secret???” and “Was this invite only?”

Exactly Gadfly’s sentiments.

Gadfly ventures to say that there’s a kind of hunger in the wider “community” for such a presentation and subsequent discussion.

Will there be a report on the meeting? Gadfly has been confused about how this group fits into the need for local public discourse responding to the George Floyd murder.

He hopes that the local press was there and that we’ll see an article on the meeting.

Who are the members of the “Community Advisory Board”? Below is a list.

At the very least, one wonders about representatives from Black Lives Matter on the Board. At the very least, one would hope that the activists who spoke at Council July 7 were present and participating last night.

Gadfly hopes that the police presentation will be repeated at the Community Engagement Initiative the Mayor may be forming per the City Council resolution and a Council Public Safety Committee meeting now in limbo because of COVID-19.

7/13/20 Community Advisory Board Membership

Robert Donchez, Mayor

Esther Lee, President Bethlehem Unit NAACP

City Council – Grace Crampsie-Smith, Michael Colon

Northampton County Executive – Lamont McClure

NAACP – Tomacene Nickens, Rabbi Levy,  Carl Nelson

Clergy – Rabbi Michael Singer, Canon Dale Grandfield

Education – Dr. Roy, Superintendent BASD

Health Department – Kristen Wenrich

Homeless – Bob Rapp, BES

Latino Advisor – Cesar Cordova, Vivian Robledo Shorey, Olga Negron,  Yadira Colon-Lopez

Youth (2) – Spencer Williams, Sydney Duffy

Police – Chief Mark DiLuzio

Police Union – Bill Audelo, President and (to be named)

Teacher’s Union – Laura Keding, President

Representative Steve Samuelson

Alex Karras, Chief of Staff

Bethlehem police use of force report

logo Latest in a series of posts about the Bethlehem Police logo

Bethlehem Police Department Report On The Use Of Force

Gadfly’s been browsing this report this morning and finds an easy-to-read format. He invites you to do likewise and see what you can see. Always go to the primary sources.

(See also: Policing in the City of Bethlehem Report: 2019)

from Christina Tatu, “Bethlehem police release report on officers’ use of force.” Morning Call, July 14, 2020.

Floyd 17

For the first time, Bethlehem police have publicly released a report detailing how often officers resorted to force, including deadly force; the race of those subjected to force; and information about how incidents involving force are reported and investigated.

“We have a very comprehensive and restrictive use-of-force policy and that report shows you that when officers do use force in Bethlehem it’s documented and it’s reviewed to see if it’s in compliance with the department policy,” DiLuzio said.

As for race, 35% of force cases involved white people and 65% involved non-white people between 2010-2019. In that period, there were 444 incidents of force involving Hispanic individuals, 400 involving white people, 276 involving Black people and eight involving Asian and other ethnicities, the report says.

According to Census Bureau population estimates from 2018, whites make up about 58% of Bethlehem’s population; Hispanics, 32%; Blacks, 5%; and Asians, 4%.

From December 2016 through 2019, there were 8,113 arrests, 434 of which involved some type of force. In 236 incidents, subjects were taken to the ground, and in 63 incidents a Taser was used.

During this time, there were also 25 incidents that involved deadly force, though there were no police shootings during this time. The report defines deadly force as an officer pointing a gun at a subject while giving commands.

Use of force rose between 2014 and 2019, which the department attributes to the adoption of a more comprehensive policy that requires officers to submit reports when a subject is taken to the ground during an arrest.

Police had 143 encounters in 2019 that used some type of force. In 98 of those incidents, force was used to make an arrest, out of 2,639 arrests last year. In the department’s other uses of force, 12 times it was used as self-defense and 15 times it was used to defend another, the report says.

There were 18 incidents when force was used to take a person into custody for mental health issues or to stop the person from hurting themselves.

A report is required whenever an officer uses force, including discharging a firearm or taking an action that results in injury, regardless of whether a weapon is used.

When force is used, footage from dash cameras and body cameras and other documentation are reviewed by the department’s Professional Standards Division. The review also involves interviews and testing of equipment.

If an officer is found to be in violation of state or federal law, the investigation is turned over to the district attorney. If the officer is in violation of any department directives, retraining or discipline may be required, the report says.

The report did not say whether there have been violations of the department’s use of force policy. DiLuzio said that since he took over as chief in 2014, there haven’t been any incidents of excessive force, but there has been occasional technical issues where an officer failed to use a defensive tactic in the correct way.

There were two such incidents in 2019. In both cases, the officers were sent for training, DiLuzio said. “Bethlehem, like other communities, does have its share of issues. No one community or agency is perfect. There is always room for communication and learning on both sides of any issue,” DiLuzio wrote in the report. He believes Bethlehem police use force at a lower rate, thanks to the department’s accreditation standards and the department’s policy.

Crowded Kitchen Players on audio during the COVID period

logo Latest in a series of posts on the Arts in Bethlehem logo

Support Local Artists!

The Crowded Kitchen Players

“Twelveness: A Play in Three Scenes” by the Crowded Kitchen Players

Legendary American pianist and songwriter George Gershwin and Austrian composer Arnold Schoenberg volley tennis balls, music theory, and musings on the meaning of art on a Beverly Hills tennis court and over dinner and drinks in a series of entertaining and provocative conversations that may never have taken place. But, they should have.

from Dave Howell, “Curtain Rises: Crowded Kitchen Players’ ‘Twelveness’ audio recording sound move for theater troupe.” Bethlehem Press, July 11, 2020.

The Crowded Kitchen Players release of “Twelveness: A Play in Three Scenes” by Charlie Barnett as an audio file retains the dramatic impact of the original stage production.

Plus, it has the advantage of portability and convenience. You can listen to it wherever and whenever you want.

Ara Barlieb and Pamela Wallace, cofounders of Crowded Kitchen Players, co-directed the audio version, recorded at Westwires Recording USA, Allentown, a fewArts 1 days before the coronavirus (COVID-19) shutdown.

The recording creates a three-dimensional sound that takes advantage of stereo and speaker separation. In the play’s opening scene, you can hear a tennis ball moving from channel to channel. The sound shifts as two tennis players talk to each other across the court.

Barnett recommends listening with headphones, preferably good ones, making sure you have the left and right channels set to the proper placement.

Barnett, an Easton native who lives in Washington, D.C., is better-known as a musician than a playwright. He has performed with his band, Chaise Lounge, at State Theatre Center for The Arts, Easton; Miller Symphony Hall, Allentown, and Musikfest and Godfrey Daniels, both Bethlehem.

Barnett has recorded numerous albums, including the recently-released “Charlie Barnett All By His Own Self.” He has composed music for TV shows, including “Saturday Night Live,” “Weeds,” “Royal Pains” and “Archer.”

The Crowded Kitchen Players has been performing at the Charles A. Brown Ice House, Bethlehem, but its recent productions were postponed because of the coronavirus shutdown. “There is no indication when it will be back up,” Barlieb says of the Ice House.

Barlieb is rehearsing the two plays that were postponed, “Book of Revelation: The Comedy” and “Dogcatcher,” and plans to present each as 10-episode videotape versions on YouiTube and other social media platforms.

Barlieb is establishing a Crowded Kitchen Players’ YouTube channel.

from Dave Howell, “Review: ‘Twelveness’ anyone? Audio play matches Gershwin, Schoenberg.” Bethlehem Press, July 11, 2020.

George Gershwin and Arnold Schoenberg did not seem to be natural tennis partners. Gershwin was 37 and Schoenberg was 62 when they met.

Although both were musical geniuses, Gershwin was a popular favorite while Schoenberg’s 12-tone method of composing was too academic and experimental to be embraced by the general public. It was called “atonal.” Schoenberg said it should have been called “pan-tonal.”

Schoenberg visited Gershwin weekly for tennis, which is the basis for the Crowded Kitchen Players audio drama production of “Twelveness: A Play in Three Scenes” by Charlie Barnett.

The Crowded Kitchen Players presented “Twelveness” in 2017 as a stage play that switched scenes between the first and second floors of the Charles A Brown Ice House, Bethlehem. It had a different cast that that for the audio version, except for Stauffer as Gertrud.

The audio version, “Twelveness: A Play in Three Scenes,” is one and one-half hour in length and is directed by Ara Barlieb and Pamela Wallace. It is much different than the stage version, drawing more attention to the theoretical music arguments, and requiring more imagination from the listener regarding character interaction.

With only four actors and an emphasis on dialogue, it works in the audio format. Oswald and Stauffer use light accents, so they can be understood, and can be distinguished from the other two characters.

The portrayals seem historically accurate and they perfectly fit the play, The story builds as Gershwin is portrayed by Ferry as gradually more and more neurotic. Schoenberg is portrayed by Oswald as unemotional except concerning music, Rogers is portrayed by Cipoletti as flirtatious. Gertrud is portrayed by Stauffer as slowly finding herself as a person.

“Twelveness: A Play in Three Scenes” by the Crowded Kitchen Players can be downloaded at: www.ckplayers.com/audio-theatre

Support Local Artists!

Voices from the Allentown protest

logo Latest in a series of posts responding to the George Floyd killing logo

from Michelle Merlin and Andrew Scott, “More than 200 march, demand change following video showing officer kneeling on man.” Morning Call, July 13, 2020.

More than 200 protesters gathered Monday evening in downtown Allentown in response to a Saturday night video, taken outside outside St. Luke’s Hospital-Sacred Heart, showing a police officer kneeling on a man’s head, near his neck.

Carrying banners stating “Black Lives Matter” and chanting “Defund the police” and “No justice, no peace,” the racially diverse crowd gathered at the Allentown Civil War memorial in response to what the video showed.

“I’m tired of this …, ” protester Rodney Bushe said to the crowd. “I’m tired of witnessing brothers and sisters with knees on their necks. I can’t breathe.”

They demanded the officer’s name, suspension and arrest; that police be defunded; an external investigation; and that elected officials either do more to end police officers’ unnecessary use of force or vacate their seats.

“These politicians try to act like we are savages who can’t manage ourselves,” said Arthur Benson, a member of the Lehigh Valley Black Lives Matter group and Action Town Activists. “We haven’t been allowed to have a seat at the table.”

Speakers at the event decried that police were violent toward a man vomiting outside a hospital who was in need of medical attention, not police force. They called for the city to defund the police and put the money toward education, mental health services and social services instead.

Zahnia Richardson attended the protest and said she found the video of the man outside the hospital disheartening. She supports the idea of defunding the police.

“I feel like a lot of the issues you need police for stem from lack of education, lack of mental health support. You could take from police funding and put it toward [things like that],” she said.

Jimmeka Hernandez, who participated in the the protest, said the video upset her. She said her children saw it and asked if it was real life or a movie.

“We educate our kids that police aren’t the enemy, but there’s a lot of police officers that aren’t doing their jobs correctly,” she said.

The crowd took a knee when Chantel Jenkins, the mother of one of four teenagers charged with inciting a riot during a January basketball game at Whitehall High School spoke. She told protesters her “worst nightmare came true,” when she saw police arresting her son and taking him into custody.

The Allentown branch of the NAACP on Sunday night issued a statement saying the video was “concerning and disturbing.” They said that once the investigation into the incident is complete, they’ll have more discussions.

“As the Allentown Police Department works through their new police policy protocols, we want them to ensure us that they are acting in a manner of integrity that shows both respect and safety for its citizens,” they said in the statement. They did not attend the rally, Secretary Barbara Redmond said in an email.

Full video of Allentown knee incident

logo Latest in a series of posts responding to the George Floyd killing logo

Floyd 15

from Andrew Scott, “Nine-minute video shows man outside hospital before officers approach, police takedown, aftermath,” Morning Call, July 13, 2020.

Allentown police on Monday released a nine-minute video showing a man kneeling, then objecting when officers put their hands on him before they forcefully restrained him, with one officer kneeling on the man’s head, near his neck, Saturday outside St. Luke’s Hospital-Sacred Heart.

The video was posted on the police department’s website as the city tries to quickly investigate the encounter, 23 seconds of which were caught on a video posted on social media Saturday. That footage showed the officer kneeling on the man, in a hold similar to the one that killed George Floyd when he was arrested by Minneapolis police. The Saturday video sparked protests in Allentown.

The video released Monday, taken from across the street from the hospital, shows the man walking slowly, almost staggering, on the road in front of the hospital and experiencing what police said appears to be a mental health crisis or drug or alcohol impairment. The officers were at the hospital on another matter when they noticed him.

The video shows the man appearing to vomit several times as he comes onto the sidewalk, drop his cellphone and have trouble walking and standing. The police gesture toward the emergency room entrance, suggesting he should go inside.

The video shows the man straighten up after he finishes vomiting. He then staggers backward into the road and an approaching car swerves around him. He then starts walking away from the officers, in the direction from which he had come, but then turns back.

About four minutes into the silent video, the man seems to gesture to two officers with his arms outstretched as they approach. As they get close, he kneels down, with his hands clasped beneath his chin before continuing to gesture and point. He briefly starts to rise to his feet, then kneels again as they come closer. He also appears to be talking to several hospital staff outside. When the officers try to pull his hands behind him, he tries to pull away.

Almost five minutes into the video, one of the officers appears to trip the man to bring him to the ground. He falls to the ground and police quickly kneel at his side to restrain him.

Shortly thereafter comes the scene caught in the video that was posted to social media, where an officer kneels on the man’s head, near his neck, for about eight seconds.

The video continues afterward, showing a spit mask being placed over the man’s head. The final minutes of the video show police and hospital staff escorting the man into the hospital, where police said he was treated and then released.

Ooops! Gadfly mis-speaks

Gadfly referred to a meeting last night as the “Mayor’s Community Advisory Board.”

The Mayor’s office reached out to correct him, saying “The Community Advisory Board was created by the local unity of the NAACP and Esther Lee at the direction of the National NAACP. The Mayor did not create the board, he agreed to participate.”

Floyd 14

Mayor’s Community Advisory Board meets tonight

logo Latest in a series of posts responding to the George Floyd killing logo

Town Hall, 6pm

About 25 members — socially distanced that will about fill the Rotunda.

(Who aren’t members? Doesn’t look like any of the young people who organized demonstrations or who spoke at Council Tuesday and are part of activist organizations.)

No notice to the general public by the City as far as Gadfly can see.

I guess we’re not invited.

Nor is there any indication of video.

No matter.

Nothing much of interest on the agenda.

Only a presentation on Police Reform by the Police Department.

Wouldn’t miss Jeopardy for that.

But hope the press is there.

Christina and Sara, depending on you.

Where are we?

logo Latest in a series of posts responding to the George Floyd killing logo

We have an opportunity to do something truly momentous.
Anna Smith

Where are we?

Gadfly’s not sure.

After just spending a half-dozen posts or so on last week’s City Council meeting, Gadfly’s not sure.

When Gadfly was 20, he was an impatient man — time was so expansive, he didn’t want to waste any.

Now that Gadfly is 80, he is still an impatient man — time is so short he doesn’t want to waste any.

Councilman Reynolds forthrightly and forcefully argued that the rationale for the Community Engagement Initiative is “to start the conversation,” “to create public pressure,” “to create change within the city and within our police department,” “to create a permanent [organic] structure that will change the face of the conversation going forward.”

At 80 your mind skips a beat. Gadfly doesn’t get this. The resolution that passed urges the City to set up this structure. There is no guarantee that it will happen. And the Mayor has already set up a Community Advisory Board with the NAACP. So what will happen to the Council resolution? It’s fate seems out of their hands.

(At Council Councilwoman Van Wirt took note of the multiplicity of committees: “When I thought about all these different committees, it seemed like we were a bunch of brooms trying to do a good job of cleaning up and kicking stuff around and not really organizing enough to sweep it up.”)

Well, there was always the promise of a Council Public Safety Committee meeting. But COVID has shot that to hell.  Listen, if you will, to this almost 20 minutes of conversation at the July 7 Council meeting about why there can’t be a Public Safety Committee meeting. It can’t he held in Town Hall. It can’t be held at Liberty. It can’t be held in Liberty stadium. It can’t be held online.

So where are we?

From the news I’m listening to, I wouldn’t be confident that COVID restrictions are going to let up any time soon.

So where are we?

Here’s what it feels like to me. Which happened on my street about 10:30. A car alarm went off. Terrible clanging. Never ending. Soon neighbors gathered around the car looking stupidly at it and each other as if our wishes would make the terrible sound go away. Our wishes would not make the terrible sound — a sound that made any other thought impossible — go away.

That’s what Council feels like to me. Ringing an alarmed car, impotent to act. Nobody with a key.

Time is not particularly on our side.

Are there any suggestions from Gadfly followers as to what Council should do to advance the conversation that is so needed and so desired?

We have an opportunity to do something truly momentous.

If only we could figure out how to meet.

Pensées for a lunch-time stroll along the Monocacy

logo Latest in a series of posts responding to the George Floyd killing logo

fragments of recent posts that swarm Gadfly’s head like bees around a hive
what are you thinking about?

One wonders, precisely at this moment, what Council’s response to the current moment would look like if Negron had been [elected president of Council].

We don’t need another task force. We need to listen to what’s going on already. We’re not listening.

I thought we matter’d . . . We don’t matter, Bro.

Do we want recruits who are all about SWAT teams? Walking in phalanxes through crowds?

The structure proposed in the resolution is basically useless until a genuinely inclusive process is created.

Have you consulted black people in the creation of this coalition?

We have an opportunity to do something truly momentous.

Council looks like it’s standing on dock waving to a boat leaving and hoping it will visit the destinations it has mentioned.

Engage a single, paid person to lead this initiative. . . .  And this person NEEDS to speak Spanish.

The optics look like same-old-same-old.

It seems that the entire message of these protests is lost on you.

Wouldn’t you rather hear from the individuals who know what it’s like to have obscenities screamed at you in a language you don’t understand by a police officer (an incident I witnessed)?

It is only a matter of time before we have our own George Floyd, or Joey Santos.

Cop-sponsored pizza parties aren’t going to appease us. That’s basically what this is.

We know what’s going on.

“The structure proposed in the resolution is basically useless until a genuinely inclusive process is created”

logo Latest in a series of posts responding to the George Floyd killing logo

Breena Holland is an Associate Professor at Lehigh University in the Department of Political Science and the Environmental Initiative. She is a past director of Lehigh University’s South Side Initiative.

Gadfly,

I believe the Councilmembers Reynolds and Crampsie Smith have good intentions. However, their responses didn’t convey an understanding of some key points raised by the callers/speakers who opposed the resolution. Even if Councilmembers Reynolds and Crampsie Smith were only trying to institutionalize a structure to bring people together and can therefore convincingly claim that it is because of these meager goals that the resolution makes no substantive commitments, they still failed to address some important problems that the callers and speakers raised.

First, in the spirit of collaboration and recognition that their own perspectives on how to address issues of racial injustice might be limited, the Reynolds and Crampsie Smith really should have asked the LatinX members of council for some input prior to proposing a resolution. It was not long ago that both Reynolds and Crampsie Smith voted against Councilwoman Negron when she was nominated to be Council president, despite some thirty people showing up to a meeting to support her nomination. One wonders, precisely at this moment, what Council’s response to the current moment would look like if Negron had been affirmed in that vote. She seemed to reluctantly support the resolution only after significant changes. It’s nice (and rare) that Reynolds agreed to her changes, but this should have been done on the front end of the process, not the back end, after Negron’s refusal to support the resolution in a formal meeting forced Reynolds to accommodate her perspective. The hypocrisy of Reynolds proposing a process to address an important problem without first getting the support of key people on Council is evident if you simply recall the anger he expressed at Councilwoman Negron for proposing an ethics ordinance (that he declined to support) without first seeking out the input from every member of Council, the mayor, and his staff.

Second, when the message of a movement is that the problem of racial injustice is structural and needs to be addressed at a foundational level, people who are not the ones suffering from those injustices may want to pause before proposing to address the problem through the same institutional structures that have thus far failed to address the problem. As the speakers explained, they (the activists) are already meeting, they are already organizing. If councilmembers really couldn’t wait to do something, why not start by learning about the problem they’ve thus far failed to address from the activists who are doing something about it? Councilmembers could go to their meetings, they could ask them how they could be helpful in their positions as elected officials. They could stop assuming that the normal processes and venues they provide for addressing problems will work. They could take a minute to wonder about how they might build new tools, proceed in a different way, include more people whose voices are generally silenced, etc. The structure proposed in the resolution is basically useless until a genuinely inclusive process is created. So far any discussion about how to make the process inclusive has been rather shallow. For instance, one caller explained the need for a person to organize the forum who actually knows the people who Council apparently wants to join this discussion. This and many other good ideas were never mentioned in the efforts by Reynolds and Crampsie Smith to defend their resolution rather than actually hear what people were saying. Councilman Callahan had a remarkably astute night in recognizing the appropriateness of tabling the resolution and for explicitly asking Councilwoman Negron what she wanted to do.

What we ended up with is a resolution that essentially asks all those people who came to the meeting (and those who never will but who are nonetheless supposed to show up and talk to councilmembers about racial justice) to make their views relevant by showing up at a forum that Council creates. I hope the activists do come because I think our elected officials could learn a lot from them. But I’m not sure why they would show up. Maybe they want to spend their time helping members of Council do their jobs better. Or maybe they should just spend their time supporting candidates who better reflect their goals and concerns, or running for elected positions themselves. Beating one’s head against the wall to achieve what is likely to be mostly more of the same from the same people is probably not a winning strategy.

Sincerely, Breena

Councilwoman Negron: “I’m not the only one who is appalled”

logo Latest in a series of posts responding to the George Floyd killing logo

original resolution
“Resolution urging the creation of a Community Engagement Initiative
in the City of Bethlehem”

Councilwoman Negron’s impatience did have effect.

I’m not the only one who is appalled by [the 2nd and 3rd paragraph]. We want to try to make the Administration accountable and push an agenda that the community wants. [Paragraphs 2 and 3] must go

Councilman Reynolds made two amendments to the resolution.

I thank you Councilman Reynolds, that’s very honorable. . . . You are saying to all the people . . . that they are not invisible.

Amended resolution:

Adding this line (might not be exact wording): “The Administration should work with and incorporate recommendations by research experts including Lehigh University’s Core Grant team who recently conducted a large research project on policing in the Lehigh Valley.”

NOW THEREFORE BE IT:RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Bethlehem urges the Mayor and his Administration to collaborate with the City of Bethlehem Police Department to create a public space and forum for the long-term discussion of issues surrounding systemic racism, discrimination, race-based inequities, social justice, mental health, addiction, poverty eradication, inclusionary housing, education, and fair policing practices(“Community Engagement Initiative”). The Community Engagement Initiative might include and/or interface with any individuals or entities that the Mayor and his Administration think appropriate such as citizens, human service organizations, the medical community, school leaders, social justice organizations, police officers,and Police Department leaders. The Administration should work with and incorporate recommendations by research experts including Lehigh University’s Core Grant team who recently conducted a large research project on policing in the Lehigh Valley.

Amended resolution:

Deleting two paragraphs

WHEREAS, following the murder of George Floyd on May 25, 2020, and during a period of justified outrage and anger,people across the nation and around the world have engaged in massive and sustained protests against persistent patterns of racial injustice and inequity in the United States and other countries. In the United States, a primary focus of these protests hasbeen on policing practices affecting Black, Latinx, and other minority communities;

WHEREAS, Bethlehem City Council thanks our Police Department and its officers for facilitating and protecting peaceful protests and we recognize our Police Department’ successful efforts in protecting public safety and property while at the same time protecting the community’s vital right of free expression. Our community has come together to grieve, talk, mobilize, and peacefully protest racial injustice in cooperation with our Police Department and not as adversaries against our police;

WHEREAS, Bethlehem City Council commends the Mayor and our Police Department for being the first City in the Lehigh Valley to release its unredacted police use of force policy and further recognizes that our Police Department proactively incorporated many of the 8 Can’t Wait police use of force directives into their operations many years prior to George Floyd’s murder, as part of the Police Department’s accreditation process,and further recognizes that the Police Department has been receptive and responsive in recently making additional changes to strengthen the 8 Can’t Wait use of force directives in Bethlehem. Moreover, we recognize our Police Department’s current community engagement efforts. We also recognize the need for further re-evaluation and review of our Department’s use of force policy to achieve compliance with all federal and state guidelines, current case law and the best standards and practices available in alignment with 8 Can’t Wait;

WHEREAS,Bethlehem City Council believes we must and can do better as a city to build stronger bridges and trust between our Police Department and our community,and that working together, we can avail ourselves of this opportunity to work collaboratively and self-reflectively to improve the relationship between our Police Department and our diverse ethnic and racial communities,that together,make up the City we all love;

The resolution, as amended, passed 7-0.

Gadfly will introduce you in some depth to the research of Prof Ochs and the team at Lehigh University in upcoming posts.

Councilwoman Negron: “We don’t need another resolution. We need action”

logo Latest in a series of posts responding to the George Floyd killing logo

Gadfly’s day job has slowed him down the past few days. He was working through the discussion of the “Resolution urging the creation of a Community Engagement Initiative in the City of Bethlehem” at the City Council meeting last Tuesday July 7.

Let’s recap: we looked at the in-person comments by people involved in demonstrations and activists in local organizations. We looked at by-phone commentary. Many of these commenters had specific lists of things needing to be done. There was impatience at more talk instead of immediate action. The newspaer characterized the commentary as “lukewarm at best.” Then we looked at rationales presented by the co-sponsors Councilman Reynolds and Councilwoman Crampsie Smith.

We are now ready to look at actual discussion of the resolution by Councilmembers.

The key voice in the discussion was Councilwoman Negron’s. Negron

Public commenters were impatient.

Councilwoman Negron was impatient.

There is incredible information that we need to consider. We don’t need another task force. We need to listen to what’s going on already. We’re not listening. The resolution needs more teeth. There’s research collected here [Prof Ochs, Lehigh University] in the Lehigh Valley. I can’t support window-dressing. We’re just creating another resolution that won’t do anything. We don’t need another resolution, we need action.

To what effect this impatience? See next–

Allentown Police Chief: “I will be on the right side of it, whatever it is”

logo Latest in a series of posts responding to the George Floyd killing logo

Kayla Dwyer, “Protesters confront Allentown mayor, police Saturday night about video of officer kneeling on man’s neck.” Morning Call, July 12, 2020.

A large group gathered Saturday night in downtown Allentown to demand answers from the Allentown Police Department and Mayor Ray O’Connell about a video taken earlier in the day that showed an officer pressing his knee into a man’s neck during an arrest.

A video circulated Saturday night on social media showing officers arresting a man outside St. Luke’s Hospital-Sacred Heart on West Chew Street in Allentown.

The video, less than 30 seconds long and taken from an unknown person’s car, shows three officers arresting the man. One of the officers appears to put his shoulder and elbow on the man’s back before pressing his knee on his neck.

Both O’Connell and Allentown police Chief Glenn Granitz Jr. showed up to the protest to answer questions and acknowledged they had seen the video. Granitz said there will be an investigation.

Speaking to some of the protesters Saturday night, O’Connell called the video “disturbing,” but said, “I think we need to gather all the facts and information before we go forward.”

The group first gathered at Seventh and Hamilton streets around 11 p.m. Saturday, after Hasshan Batts, executive director of Promise Neighborhoods of the Lehigh Valley, issued a call to action in a live Facebook video.

“Where are we going to make it loud and clear that this is not OK?,” he said, en route to the meeting spot. “If this is not OK to you, meet me on Seventh and Hamilton, right now.”

They then marched to the police precinct at 10th and Hamilton, with chants such as “Say his name, George Floyd,” the Minneapolis man who was killed in May after an officer knelt for nearly nine minutes on his neck.

Some knocked repeatedly on the doors and windows of the precinct while others blocked the street out front, continuing chants like “Hands up, don’t shoot.”

Some also made phone calls to the precinct and to the mayor.

O’Connell arrived shortly before midnight, and Granitz soon after.

Protesters asked for the name of the officer who pressed his knee against the man and asked Granitz for his response to what he saw in the video.

“As a human being, a knee on the neck, is that OK?” asked Maegan Llerena, director of Make the Road Pennsylvania.

“We’re going to take a look at it. We’re going to go through everything. And we’re going to give you an update as soon as we can,” Granitz responded.

“I don’t have a 24-hour, 48-hour time table for you,” Granitz said when a resident asked how long an investigation would take.

The protest ended around 12:30 a.m. Batts took to the megaphone to urge a peaceful dispersal, saying two point people would be following up with police.

Granitz could not give many details about the video Saturday night.

“I just got here, and I’m here to look at it,” he told protesters gathered in a circle around him. “I’ve seen a short clip.”

“Just be on the right side of this,” a protester said to him.

“I will be on the right side of it, whatever it is,” Granitz responded.

Video: “I thought we mattered.” Schlossberg: “I can’t unhear his voice.”

logo Latest in a series of posts responding to the George Floyd killing logo

from Daniel Patrick Sheehan, “Video of Allentown police officer kneeling on man’s neck: Woman who took it says she was shocked, and George Floyd’s attorney weighs in.” Morning Call, July 12, 2020.

The woman who shot a video outside St. Luke’s Hospital-Sacred Heart in Allentown, Pa., that shows a police officer putting his knee on a man’s head and neck during an arrest said the man was screaming “Mira, mira!” — Spanish for ‘Look, look!‘”

“That means he knew what was going on and he was screaming for someone like me to see,” said the woman, an Allentown resident who doesn’t want her name made public and uses a pseudonym on Facebook.

Assistant Chief Bill Lake said the incident came under immediate review, in keeping with the department’s use-of-force policy.

“As soon as this came to light, we got the ball rolling,” he said. Lehigh County District Attorney Jim Martin said his office will review Allentown’s conclusions, adding he can’t comment on the case until that process is done.

The video, less than 30 seconds long, shows one of the officers putting his shoulder and elbow on the man’s back before pressing his knee on his head and neck.

The video is already garnering national attention — including from attorney Benjamin Crump, who represents Floyd’s family.

Mayor Ray O’Connell and Allentown police Chief Glenn Granitz Jr. showed up to the protest to answer questions. O’Connell called the video “disturbing,” but said, “I think we need to gather all the facts and information before we go forward.”

Granitz added that he couldn’t say when the investigation would be finished. “I don’t have a 24-hour, 48-hour time table for you,” he said.

Through its Facebook page, the local Black Lives Matter group said it is awaiting official statements from the city before deciding what to do next.

Meanwhile, the group has issued six demands: that the body camera footage of the arrest be released; that all officers involved be suspended pending an external investigation; that the mayor, police chief and city council president make a public statement; that the man’s name and medical condition be released; that a criminal justice review board be put in place to oversee Allentown, Bethlehem and Easton; and that Allentown reallocate funds from the police department “into the community.”

On Twitter, Allentown Councilman Joshua Siegel, who was at the protest, said he was “disgusted and outraged” and made similar demands, including the officers’ suspension and the release of names and body camera footage.

Siegel’s council colleague, Ce-Ce Gerlach, who also attended the protest, posted a video to Facebook in which she said she felt “raw” over the incident.

“That’s why I went down [to the protest] last night,” she said. “Not as a City Council member but as a resident that wants to see justice here in Allentown.”

Democratic U.S. Rep. Susan Wild issued a statement Sunday calling the video “sickening” and “yet another instance of unwarranted force against a Black man.” She pointed to the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act recently passed by the House, which would prohibit the use of this kind of force across the country, among other reforms.

“We cannot continue to allow the lethal combination of systemic racism and excessive use of force to rot our system of justice,” she wrote.

Also on Twitter, state Rep. Mike Schlossberg, who represents Allentown, said he was horrified when he saw the video and stressed the importance of a thorough investigation.

“The protestors last night were chanting ‘Black Lives Matter’ for a reason,” he wrote. “You’d have to be heartless to not hear the pain and anger in their voices, or the trauma in the voice of the man in the video saying, ‘I thought we mattered.’ I can’t unhear his voice.”

BASD to review African American history in the curriculum

logo Latest in a series of posts responding to the George Floyd killing logo

from Jacqueline Palochko, “Black Lives Matter movement prods Bethlehem and other districts to review how history is taught.” Morning Call, July 12, 2020.

Jared Dowling was surfing the internet three years ago in June when he noticed a Google Doodle paying tribute to Juneteenth. Having no idea what the event was, Dowling, a 2020 Freedom High School graduate heading to Syracuse University, spent all day reading about how it originated in Texas on June 19, 1865, when slaves learned of their freedom — two years after the Emancipation Proclamation was signed.

In four years of high school, Dowling, who is Black, never learned about Juneteenth in classes. But that didn’t surprise him. “There was never going to be a heavy focus on things of that nature in history class,” Dowling said.

Schools do not honestly and accurately teach the struggles and history of African Americans, Bethlehem Area School District Superintendent Joseph Roy acknowledged. That’s why he is proposing that the district spend the next year reforming middle and high school history courses.

“Going way back, American history was to teach how great the country is,” Roy said. “And we are a great country, and I think we’re great enough that we can look at our failures and the progress we’ve made.”

By state law, Pennsylvania public schools must teach ethnic and racial relations, which could include segregation and racial profiling. By third grade, students are taught about the “treatment of minority groups in history.” But the state doesn’t mandate specific courses. Districts build their own curriculum, with approval from school boards.

Roy would like Bethlehem’s history classes to go into more moments that deeply affected African American communities. While the civil rights movement is taught, for example, it’s often quickly done at the end of the school year and not given enough time. Roy would also like classes to delve into historical policies that heavily contributed to income disparities facing African Americans today.

About 11% of Bethlehem’s 13,600 students are Black.

“We know about slavery and we know it’s bad, but then we jump through Reconstruction, Jim Crow, civil rights,” Roy said. “We don’t do enough to understand the long-term structural impacts.”

The lack of teaching of African American history is not a knock on teachers, Roy said. As a former social studies teacher, he only recently learned about Juneteenth himself and knows other events were left out of his lessons. It also goes back to what teachers were taught when it comes to race relations. That’s why he wants to make sure the district finds the right resources and offers the necessary instruction to teachers before reforming history courses.

“We have to have teachers learn more and be given the materials,” Roy said.

School board President Michael Faccinetto expects the board to support a review of the history curriculum.

“I think it’s important to teach an honest account of history, not a comfortable one,” Faccinetto said, adding that history classes should teach more about the struggles of African Americans between the Civil War and the civil rights movement.

A review of the history curriculum is a step in the right direction, Dowling, the soon-to-be Syracuse student, said. But the disparities in white and Black communities shouldn’t just come up in history classes, he said.

During his four years at Freedom, Dowling observed that he was the only Black student in his high school honors classes, the only Black student who ran for student council and the only one on the debate team.

There have been times in class, such as when slavery comes up, when Dowling has felt his white classmates’ eyes drift toward him in an uncomfortable way. But there isn’t anything wrong in feeling uncomfortable, Dowling said.

“We need to have those uncomfortable conversations so people know this is not OK,” he said. “Even if the class is overwhelmingly white, people should be educated on the plights the Black community has faced.”

Plastic-Free July: Takeout and Delivery

logo Latest in a series of posts on the environment logo

Alison Steele is a Liberty High School alum who traveled the world looking for adventure and purpose before finding it in Pittsburgh.  She has made it her mission to help others make more informed decisions around how they interact with people and the planet.

from Steele’s “Plastic-Free July: Part 2”

Back near the beginning of the pandemic, when restaurants began shutting down for dine-in, and grocery stores started banning reusable bags, several of my friends were asking me what I was doing in those situations. I was incredibly flattered when one of my best friends said she had a “what would Ali do?” moment. The truth is that I have been struggling with these things myself because when public health becomes a factor, it’s harder to make what would otherwise be relatively simple choices.

My previous Plastic-Free July and Zero-Waste Lent challenges were each a comparative piece of cake because I could buy in bulk with my own containers or take reusable mugs to coffee shops. Those things are, understandably, not options at the moment. I would love to say that I’ve gotten creative, but mostly I’ve just been cutting back back: opting out of meals from certain restaurants and foregoing certain ingredients when grocery shopping.

continue on “Plastic-Free July: Part 2”

Gadfly got some take-out Sunday, and there was so much plastic he wondered how the business made any money.