Candidates take note: the key to equity (21)

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey and encourage someone else also

(21st in a series of posts on candidates for election)

Peter Crownfield is officially retired but spends most of his time working with students in his role as internship coordinator for the Alliance for Sustainable Communities–Lehigh Valley.

Gadfly & the candidates might be interested in a recent post on the Culture of Health blog, titled “A Blueprint to Help Communities Promote Equity.” While it focuses on health equity, the principles are universal.

One key is the need to *actively* involve community members who will be most affected. . . . This means ensuring that residents understand potential trade-offs and indirect consequences of policy decisions and have a say in what happens. Proposed actions should deal with the systemic issues that are causing problems.

Peter

Put on a stickie and attach to your bathroom mirror.

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey and encourage someone else also

 

Curbscaping makes Gadfly smile

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey and encourage someone else also

The Gadfly invites “local color” photos of this sort

Big-time streetscaping going on on S. New (more on that soon).

Big money streetscaping going on on S. New.

But small is beautiful too.

Gadfly’s walk on N. New was just enhanced by this little parcel of curbscaping.

167

And the new sidewalk will be appreciated by you-know-who-you-are.

How thoughtful of the homeowners for this touch of beauty.

Gadfly wants them to know he noticed their street-art.

And appreciates.

We don’t always need the City.

What are you seeing as you walk around town?

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey and encourage someone else also

Council Candidates – 2-year seat – Question 2 (20)

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey and encourage someone else also

(20th in a series of posts on candidates for election)

Election Day is May 21.

Once again a tip o’ the hat and a wave of the wings to the candidates for helping us be more informed voters.

Reverse alphabetical order this time.

Vote for one.

What goals, proposals, ideas, issues, problems, or concerns motivate you to seek a seat on City Council?

Grace Crampsie Smith grace crampsie smith

Health, Safety, and Well-Being of All
We must assure the health, safety and well-being of all citizens, employees and visitors to the city. This is imperative foremost in my mind and will continue to be when making decisions for Bethlehem as your city council representative. We must specifically address the opioid crisis, lack of mental health services and affordable housing.

Socially Responsible Economic Development
We must balance progress with preservation. I believe in robust economic development that is congruent with the best interests of the citizens, environment and infrastructure of the community.

Economic Efficacy
I will continue to assure taxpayer funds are spent most efficiently and effectively. I have managed multi-million dollar taxpayer funded budgets in my professional experience and have had to make heart-wrenching decisions in disbursement of government funds to our most vulnerable populations — those with Developmental Disabilities and those with Mental Illness. I successfully oversaw the transformation of our service delivery system, resulting in the elimination of waiting lists and provision of vital services to all in need.

Ashley Daubert  Ashley Daubert

As a lifelong Bethlehem resident, I have seen the City change greatly over the years. I have had the opportunity to see some initiatives flourish, and others fail — and have tried to look at each success or failure as a learning experience. What could we have done differently? Why didn’t that work? How can we change things moving forward? What is best for Bethlehem? All of those root cause analyses have motivated me to run for City Council, to make sure we are continually learning, planning, and working toward our “best Bethlehem.”

As we move forward, I will be explaining the following quality-of-life centered goals and initiatives in further detail, but this list is an introduction to what types of things I intend to focus on as a Councilwoman.

  • Honesty and transparency in leadership; modernizing City presence on the internet, utilizing social media, and making information about the state of our City, tax dollar allocation, and upcoming projects, more available to our residents.
  • Taxes; I intend to hold the line on taxes.
  • Infrastructure; evaluating and assessing areas of improvement, and continuing to address issues affecting public safety.
  • Economic Growth; I support economic growth and expansion within the City, but will hold a strong position related to equal opportunity, diversity, and inclusion, within the workplace. I also believe we need to be equally concerned with preservation of Bethlehem’s historical sites, and minimizing our ecological footprint.
  • Renewable Resources; I will support and encourage the use of renewable resources within the City, efforts to implement a climate change action plan, and initiatives that promote sustainable living, like the Bethlehem Food Co-Op.
  • Children; I’d like to see a playground built or modified in our City that is handicap accessible. I think all children deserve to play. I’d also like to have discussions with the BASD School Board to determine how we as Council Members, School Board Members, and City residents can come together to address the school lunch debt(s) within our District, and bullying within our schools.
  • Community Health and Wellness; I am an ANCC board certified, psychiatric-mental health, registered nurse (RN). I have dedicated my life to helping other people, and battling the negative stigma that is associated with “mental illness.” I want to be an advocate for those who may not feel they are able to speak up — initiating discussions and change related to how we address issues like the opioid epidemic and addiction, suicide prevention, crime, homelessness, domestic violence, and bullying within our City.

I look forward to discussing these goals and initiatives in further detail, as well as some others, and I am really excited about what the future holds for Bethlehem.

Will Carpenter Will Carpenter

Establishing a vision for a growth in Bethlehem to make the most of the new economic changes/opportunities. There is so much good data and information available. We must study, plan and pursue a vision for our city. I believe in responsible, green growth and development with strong city leadership.

I also believe it time to strengthen our ethical government laws. As citizens we must have full faith that our elected representatives are only answering to the voters. We have witnessed issues in Allentown and Reading, and we should put in place strong measures to make certain no such activity takes place in Bethlehem. I have no reason to not trust our elected officials, but as a tax payer I believe in trust-but-verify approach.

 

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey and encourage someone else also

Council Candidates – 4-year seat – Question 2 (19)

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey and encourage someone else also

(19th in a series of posts on candidates for election)

Election Day is May 21.

Once again a tip o’ the hat and a wave of the wings to the candidates for helping us be more informed voters.

Reverse alphabetical order this time.

Vote for three.

What goals, proposals, ideas, issues, problems, or concerns motivate you to serve or continue to serve on City Council?

Paige Van Wirt (incumbent) Van Wirt 2

Transparency: I am reintroducing the Ethics Ordinance this spring — citizens must be able to trust their own government. The proposed Ethics Ordinance will bring sunlight to campaign finance, including measures that mandate recusal of a councilperson from voting on a measure when they have accepted significant political donations from the beneficiary of the measure, usually a developer. The ordinance addresses contracting relationships, nepotism and financial disclosures as well. Everything that is done on council and by Bethlehem’s public officials should be easily accessible and understandable by the average citizen. I am committed to opening up the decision-making of our municipal government to the view of the citizens, including the workings of our commissions and authorities, especially authorities that use taxpayer-leveraged funds for their activities.

Accountability: I will continue to exert exacting financial oversight to our budget and ordinance measures, asking tough questions and requiring sufficient data before voting on any measure. Citizens should plainly and clearly understand the reasoning behind a council member’s vote on each issue. I understand the impact of taxes on our citizens, and how devastating each incremental increase can be. I understand how a parking-meter rate increase can impact our downtown businesses, and I performed my own survey to ensure I really knew how our small businesses would be affected. As a representative body, City Council should be held in account for all Bethlehem’s citizens, including people struggling with opioid addiction, people who are homeless, as well as people unable to find affordable housing. How do our current zoning measures inhibit the production of affordable housing? We should be looking closely at the ways our current laws impact smart development in our city. Accountability also extends to our environment. Bethlehem City Council should lead the way with measures to increase green efficiencies in new buildings, decrease our solid waste stream and work on measuring and addressing our air quality.

Walkability: Bethlehem can become even more of an invigorating, economically-charged city by reinforcing our gifts — among them history, charm, and geography, with a plan that looks to increasing the walkability of our wonderful city, as mundane as fixing our sidewalks, or as transformative as a pedestrian bridge project. Walkability powers property values. Walkability attracts new talent and capital, by creating more, and better, jobs. Walkability creates community, and to do this we must invest in attainable housing in our downtowns, to create density. We can mandate smart inclusionary zoning, to help address the lack of affordable housing. Arts are the anchor and catalyst to a healthy city. We should help our local arts community be more visible, with more public art and performances. There is an economic renaissance headed to Bethlehem and we must start planning now, to help shape a Bethlehem that provides a joyful, dynamic quality of life for all our citizens.

David Saltzer David Saltzer

My first and foremost goal as a Bethlehem City Council member would be to make Bethlehem a safe city for our residents, visitors, and employees. As a retired City of Bethlehem Firefighter who had to retire early due to an on-the-job injury, I feel that we need to do everything in our power to make sure that everyone is safe and goes home at the end of the day. This is the true motto of public safety workers — Everyone goes home.

I also believe in responsible development within the city and attracting businesses that will provide good jobs and decent living wages and benefits to its employees, therefore allowing the city to grow and the people to reinvest in the city.

We also need a city government that is united and working toward the same goals related to safety, economic growth and stability, and a high quality of life. My experience as a firefighter, 911 dispatcher, and former union president of the Bethlehem Firefighters IAFF Local 735 affords me a distinctive and unique approach to city council. My first-hand accounts will help bridge the gap between council, administration, and city employees by using my years of experience interacting with all aspects of city government, negotiating contracts and language, speaking on issues with council, and sitting on various committees.

My career fighting fires ended earlier than I desired, so now I strive to stay involved in different ways to serve the city’s employees, residents, and visitors. Being a City Council member enables me to continue to serve the city I love in ways in which I feel passionate. This opportunity is another way I can make a difference.

Carol Ritter Ritter

I thought about running for a long time and have admired the progress I’ve seen in the city for so long.

I’m interested in smart common-sense economic development in Bethlehem.  It is an essential element to the success of our city and its ability to bring new jobs into the community for our citizens, along with creating new tax revenue streams so the burden does not have to fall solely on our homeowners many of whom are seniors on a fixed income and working-class families.

Open and transparent decision making — I intend to be an active listener and have no pre-determined agenda.  Gathering all the facts, collaborating with experts, working with council, and listening to the public will enable me to make educated, informed, and transparent decisions.

Small business growth — the strength of Bethlehem’s downtowns are its small businesses.  I have tremendous passion for small businesses and have made my career helping them to grow and prosper.

Quality of Life — In order to keep our neighborhoods strong, I will not lose sight of the importance of delivering effective and efficient services to all citizens.  I have been a strong advocate of Bethlehem’s Mounted Police for years and believe they are just one program that assists in keeping our city safe.

I support environmental protections and initiatives that would add to our quality of life.   Clean water and a clean environment add so much to a city . . . jobs, health and wellness, making our city attractive to visitors and those looking to relocate, and added recreational opportunities

J. William Reynolds (incumbent) JWReynolds

Bethlehem’s Climate Action Plan – Since being elected to City Council, I have worked to support the City of Bethlehem’s commitment to maintaining and protecting our environment. In 2017, I was proud to propose Bethlehem’s first climate action plan.  Utilizing the expertise of citizens, local environment groups, our Environmental Advisory Council, and city employees, we are building a climate action plan that includes citywide energy reduction goals, internal governmental reduction goals, legislative policy recommendations, and mitigation strategies for vulnerable areas of our city. Our climate action plan also is creating a permanent structure of citizens and local environmental groups that will remain engaged and able to advocate for environmental responsibility going forward.

NorthSide 2027 – Our neighborhoods are our most valuable asset as a community.  When I proposed Northside 2027 a few years ago, the goal was to invest in our north side neighborhoods that surround William Penn and Thomas Jefferson Elementary schools. Working with the Bethlehem Area School District, Moravian College, residents, and small businesses, significant work has been completed in 2018 and 2019 to design and implement improvements in these neighborhoods by focusing on the issues facing our families and residents related to housing, recreation opportunities, transportation, and commercial corridors. I am looking forward to the release of the plan shortly and getting to work on the priorities of the neighborhoods as determined by the residents.

Technology – Bethlehem’s current technology initiatives have the ability to transform the way things are done in our city. I am proud to be working with the Administration on our open data portal, improving our social media and communication channels, digital equity, and developing a Bethlehem app.  Our technology initiatives are a vital component in creating opportunities for everyone in our community as well as keep Bethlehem at the forefront of innovation in the region.

Michael Colon (incumbent) Colon 2

These last 3+ years have been a great privilege, which is why I ask for another term to continue my service to Bethlehem.  Bethlehem is in the midst of a major transition as we move our city 911 operations up to Northampton County to take over service.  A 911 center is something we don’t usually think about until we are faced with an emergency requiring us to call for help.  The 911 center also handles all non-emergency calls and dispatches for our first responders.  Given my work history as a former Northampton County 911 dispatcher and knowledge of 911 operations, I will continue to help provide oversight through the merger and beyond to ensure adequate service.

I’d also continue to focus energy towards the ongoing opioid problem, which we are in the midst of.  Four years ago a Bethlehem patrolman told me heroin was the biggest problem he faced every day at work as a police officer. Not five minutes after our conversation, he was dispatched to an overdose.  The numbers nationally, regionally, and locally are alarming.  In the past few years Bethlehem has instituted the BPAIR program to provide an easier path towards treatment while first responders are carrying naloxone to battle the wave of overdose calls.  I will continue to advocate for all efforts to quell the spread of this poison throughout our community.

Lastly, I want City Hall to continue to have the resources necessary to meet the needs of our community.  Staffing at City Hall is at the lowest anyone can remember.  As the cost of doing business continues to rise each department is facing tighter budgets.  The City must continue to find responsible ways to develop and grow our tax base to maintain the level of service Bethlehem expects from its local government.

 

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey and encourage someone else also

Questions for candidates, please (18)

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey and encourage someone else also

(18th in a series of posts on candidates for election)

Aidan Levinson, “Your View by Emmaus High School student: Why local elections are crucial to our daily lives.” Morning Call, April 4, 2019.

There are too many elected officials at the local level with partisan and self-serving agendas driving them. . . . The impact local government has on our daily lives is real and powerful. . . . Washington, D.C. isn’t the only place where laws are made and policies are developed that affect us. Get involved, get active, learn more about our local government organizations. I hope to see you out there pushing for change and voting in every election.

Gadfly urges you to read Aidan for a bit of Friday morning civic participation tonic. A waker-upper!

So we have a City Council election coming up. Do you know the candidates? Can you identify them? Can you distinguish them?

Appearance is one thing, but distinguishing them on the basis of their talent, intelligence, goals, position, beliefs, experience, and so forth is, of course, the most important thing. Gadfly wants to be the most informed voter in a local election that he has ever been. And he wants to help others who feel the same way. That might mean getting out to see and listen to and question the candidates, though that is not always possible or efficient.

So, in order to distinguish the candidates on substance, Gadfly has asked the candidates to reply to a series of questions/prompts that he will publish together for efficient comparison. The candidates are graciously cooperating. Last week they addressed their personal qualifications, this week it will be their platform issues, and next week they’ll be asked to pick one of their issues and go deeper on it.

Gadfly would like some help on forming the subsequent questions/prompts. What do you want to know? If you were at a “rally” or a debate, what would you ask of the candidates? Gadfly would like to know, and he will compile and condense them and present them to the candidates.

For instance, Kathy Fox offered an example of such a question/prompt when Gadfly opened this thread back in February:

So, prospective city council members, what changes in the existing City of Bethlehem zoning, planning, building codes, etc. are you willing to propose and support to more effectively battle climate change on a local level, and how quickly will you do this once you are elected?

That’s the kind of thing that Gadfly wants from you. And your contributions don’t have to be as polished or as finely honed as Kathy’s. And you are not limited to one. And they will be anonymous. Let him know howevermany topics on which you would like a response that will help us get to know the candidates in a significant way and help you build the good judgment that leads to a meaningful, informed vote.

Gadfly hopes to hear from you!

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey and encourage someone else also

 

Communication issues

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

Councilman Reynolds announced at Council Tuesday night that there were 361 responses so far to the Communications Survey.

Gadfly was mightily relieved that the survey seems to have gotten off to a good start.

But we should still beat the drums. Gadfly urges followers not only to make sure to take the survey but to strongly recommend it to others.

And he hopes the City will keep beating the drums too. Gadfly saw a brief note in the Bethlehem Press, for instance, but only about the fact of the survey — no explanation of what it is for and why it is important — no sense of why it is important for people to invest some time to do it. Gadfly feels it’s worthy of planting an interview in which the Mayor, Councilman Reynolds, or somebody could “pitch” the importance of the survey. There’s no explanation of the survey, no “hook,” on the City web page either.

Gadfly — an inveterate worrier as well as whiner — hopes we’re doing all we can to engage public participation.

Councilwoman Van Wirt is doing her part — look at her not a half-hour ago not only beat the drum but crack the whip on the “Complainers of Bethlehem” Facebook page! She’s in the face of the tiger! I’ll bet by now her house has been toilet-paper’d.

Bravo!

A related comment about communication–

In recent “modest proposals” both here and at Council meetings (see under Topics on the sidebar), Gadfly has advanced the notion that City Council meetings be seen more as the face and the hub of City governance, and in other places he has whined about the venue for the Mayor’s “State of the City” address.

Councilman Reynolds suggested that the Mayor’s address could be repeated at Council, and Tuesday the Mayor did that. There were virtually no attendees from the public and  — wouldn’t you know — audio problems rendered the live-stream useless.

Goddam and etc., etc. etc., Gadfly was heard to say. Gadfly who didn’t audio record that portion of the meeting.

So the wider public audience still didn’t have the opportunity to hear the Mayor present the address.

A shame. Bad luck.

Gadfly clapped after. Solitary. Like one hand clapping. Awkward.

Regardless of your politics, the “State of the City” address is a big deal. And there were lots of good things in the address. Things to feel good about.

So, ok, the Mayor’s perspective on the state of the City may not be everybody’s. And Gadfly has also modestly proposed next year gathering maybe 4 people to provide their versions. So that this ritual occasion can be one of wide healthy conversation.

But, though Gadfly appreciates Councilman Reynold’s suggestion and the way the Mayor responded immediately to that suggestion,  the empty Council chamber still didn’t quite feel the right place for the address. Maybe he would have felt differently if the occasion had been bally-hoo’d a bit as being available on television and the audio had worked.

In some way the “State of the City” address has to be heard, felt, wrestled with, ingested, responded to by the wider general public.

As is, it’s too easy for those “out here” to miss it completely.

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

Should Bethlehem ban single-use plastic bags?

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

(The latest in a series of posts relating to the environment, Bethlehem’s Climate Action Plan, Bethlehem’s Environmental Advisory Council)

The headline says it all!  What do you think?

Nicole Radzievich, “Should Bethlehem ban single-use plastic bags?” Morning Call, April 2, 2019.

Taking aim at plastic pollution, the city’s Environmental Advisory Committee wants to prohibit city businesses from offering single-use plastic bags to customers to carry out their purchases and require businesses to charge a 10-cent fee at the point of sale on paper bags, many of which aren’t recycled.

[See the EAC proposal here: EAC.Plastic.Bag.Ordinance.Proposal]

“With everything going on in Washington, we thought that if they’re not going to do anything, this is something we can do here and make an impact,” said Elizabeth BehrendBehrend, EAC member and head of the waste reduction committee. “It’s important that we put forth the effort to care for our environment.”

Narberth, Montgomery County, in October became the first borough in Pennsylvania to regulate plastic bags, imposing a 10-cent fee on the bags and requiring customers to ask for plastic straws rather than they being distributed by default. From Boston to Seattle, individual municipalities have imposed either fees or bans on plastic bags in recent years.

In January, Northampton County Council passed a resolution calling for municipalities to rein in plastic consumption, stopping short of imposing fees on single-use plastic bags. County Councilwoman Tara Zrinski said she didn’t have enough support among her colleagues to include fees and who wanted to get the resolution passed. Zrinski said there is a notion — which she doesn’t ascribe to — that fees on bags are akin to a tax on the poor. She said many groceries in poorer neighborhoods don’t offer bags and said there are grant opportunities that could purchase reusable bags for certain neighborhoods.

Alex Baloga, president of the Pennsylvania Food Merchants Association, said there are better ways to address issues plastic bags pose than forcing stores to levy fees on customers or banning them all together. He said the focus should be on education and recycling — which businesses are doing in-store.

If and how this plastic bag ban will play out in Bethlehem is unclear. The EAC submitted its proposal to City Council in February and Behrend made her pitch to City Council earlier this month during courtesy of the floor when anyone can talk about anything. Council hasn’t scheduled any committee meetings on it.

City Council President Adam Waldron said the proposal won’t be considered unless a council member calls for it to be discussed. Councilman J. William Reynolds, chairman of the Human Resources and Environment Committee, said he agrees that plastic bag use needs to be reduced but the question is the most effective in doing that. Reynolds, who pushed for the city’s first climate action plan, said he had to review the specifics of the proposal before taking a position and looked forward to hearing what Mayor Robert Donchez’s administration has to say about it.

In an interview Donchez said he was not ready to take a position on the proposal until its vetted, but there’s merit in having a discussion. He said he would like to see how policies have played out in cities as large and diverse as Bethlehem. Initially, he said, he has concerns about imposing fees on bags.

Behrend said the proposal would serve as a starting point for discussion and the EAC is open to feedback. Her committee is also working on plans to get the schools involved. The idea is to launch coloring contests for students to design reusable bags that could be sold at fundraisers to get the word out about the dangers of plastic bags.

It sounds like this proposal  might need a little push. If you support consideration of such a ban, nudging local officials seems in order. Note that contact info for the Mayor and councilpersons can be found on the Gadfly sidebar.

Gadfly will take a look at the politics of the Narberth proposal next time.

(photo credit Douglas Graves/Bethlehem Press)

It’s Thursday, April 4, do you know where your local Climate Action Plan is?

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

Charter schools: The Roy Report (19)

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

(19th in a series on Education and Charter Schools)

Gadfly promised a report on his March 28 meeting on the charter school issue with BASD Superintendent Dr. Joseph Roy and hastens to get to it this morning before his notes go stone cold.

It was a great meeting. Dr. Roy is a warm individual and especially “warm” over the issue of charter schools. He was extremely gracious and overflowed with information.

Not wanting to eat up too much of a busy man’s time, Gadfly told Dr. Roy that the focus of his visit was narrowly on why our students are going to charter schools, but Dr. Roy thought it important to start at the beginning — with the privatization movement itself.

More on this basic and wider issue in subsequent posts, but, as promised, let’s focus here on that question of why our local students are going to charter schools.

BASD doesn’t have surveys, but here are some of the reasons, in no particular order, that Dr. Roy has gathered from interactions with parents of charter school students.

A range of local reasons from the very practical to the highly academic.

  • full-day kindergarten: not an issue now because BASD offers it, but this was attractive to some parents because of work situations
  • transportation: BASD does not bus everybody but is required to do so for charter schools
  • uniforms: conventional in some cultures
  • cachet (good SAT word): a private school education without the cost
  • bullying: need for a change of scene
  • the academic program: such as LVA’s IB curriculum

Gadfly will reach out to Lehigh Valley Academy in particular, the school that enrolls the most BASD students, to see what they can tell us about why parents are choosing charter schools.

But Gadfly would like to hear from charter school families themselves. Gadfly doesn’t know any. Is there no one among Gadfly followers with charter school experience that could help fill in the picture for us with personal motivations?

And look soon for more on the general charter school movement from my conversation with Dr. Roy.

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

Bethlehem Moment 9: Supporting Moravian Single Women

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

Bethlehem Moment 9
City Council
April 2, 2019
Video (start at min. 3:08)

Ed Gallagher, 49 W. Greenwich St.

This Bethlehem Moment was delivered on “Equal Pay Day,” was inspired by Councilman Callahan’s evolving wage discrimination ordinance proposal, and was written with Gadfly’s nine granddaughters firmly in mind.

A Bethlehem Moment: August 13, 1757

“Virtually every woman in 17th and 18th century America eventually married.”
recent textbook

“To whom should the helpless Maiden go?” Penry’s life in America constitutes an answer to that question. If she were lucky, the “helpless Maiden” could “go” to a Moravian single sisters’ house, which offered economic and social, as well as spiritual, asylum.
Scott Gordon

On August 13, 1757, Mary Penry (1735-1804) received communion in the Gemeinhaus chapel, marking her full membership in the Moravian Church. She would live in the Bethlehem Single Sisters’ House till 1762 before moving to the Single Sisters’ House in Lititz for the rest of her life. We mark this moment to value the role that our Sisters’ Houses played for women single either by fate or choice. Penry was born in Wales where her parents lived in “desperate and worrisome circumstances.” At age 9, after the death of her father, Penry moved with her mother to live with a female relative in Philadelphia, only to live a life of “Egyptian bondage” under the roof of the relative’s husband, a “terrible person,” whom after the relative died, impregnated her mother, marrying her only two months after the baby was born, a union Penry describes as “true despair,” for the husband threatened to kill her “daily.” Penry was a vulnerable teen, poor – the wealthy husband died absolutely unfairly leaving her and her mother literally only a few shillings – and she would remark that put a “u” in her name and you get “penury” – Mary Penury — poor and sexual prey herself she was. But at age 19 Penry found the Brethren’s church, had a saving vision of the wounds of Christ, learned of Single Sisters’ House from the famed artist Johann Valentine Haidt, whose portraits can be found in museums around the City, and came to Bethlehem. Penry chose to remain single: “I desire to spend and be spent in the service of the virgin choir,” she said. The Sisters’ Houses gave this single woman family, religious refuge, economic refuge, and a satisfying career. She was bookkeeper, accountant, translator, town guide – she embroidered. She was gainfully employed. She was no grumpy old maid, no silenced cloistered nun – her editor/biographer describes the voice in her letters as devout, yes, but garrulous, witty, plaintive, worldly-wise, curious, heartbroken, joyous, prophetic, bold, irreverent. Sisters’ House gave Mary Penry and other women the choice to remain single. Thus, Sisters’ House gave Mary Penry and other single women life.

Drawn from Scott Paul Gordon, ed., The Letters of Mary Penry: A Single Moravian Woman in Early America (University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 2018).

A few additional soundbites from Dr. Gordon’s book:

  • Penry may have been an “ordinary” woman, but she is unusual in an important way for historians of early America: she writes, self-consciously as a single woman at a time when singleness was rare.
  • The choice to remain single was made possible by the Moravian communities in which Penry lived. . . . Single women lived together in great stone buildings called “choir” houses. In these choir houses, which still stand, Moravian single sisters lived, worked, and worshiped alongside one another. They also laughed, played music, gossiped, and mourned their dead.
  • Visitors to Bethlehem between 1754 and 1773, for instance, would have found that about 54 percent of the community’s women were single, having never married. . . . The number of those who, like Penry chose to remain single throughout their life was high. In 1758, for instance, Penry lived with ninety-three others in Bethlehem’s single sisters’ house. . . . It was a remarkably diverse group of women. An astonishing 42 percent of these women remained single sisters for their entire life.
  • This arrangement offered an extraordinary amount of authority to women, who . . . were “led and guided by people like themselves, which . . . elsewhere in the whole world is not usual.”
  • None of these Moravian communities relegated single women to the “usual despised State of Old Maids.”
  • The popularity of the single sisters’ choir took Bethlehem’s founders by surprise.
  • Many Moravians, including single sisters such as Penry, also preserved persistent and deeply felt social ties with the world beyond Moravian settlements.
  • Moravian single sisters’ houses embraced women whose circumstances had left them little hope.
  • Penry never worried that she would become destitute. Her community would care for her even if she could no longer contribute economically.

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

Mayor Donchez on “The State of the City” tonight at City Council — live-streamed if you can’t make it in person

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

Gadfly alert!

A reminder that City Council meets the first and third Tuesday of each month 7PM at Town Hall.

donchez

 

Tonight especially special!

Mayor Donchez on “The State of the City.”

Don’t miss.

 

So, if you aren’t coming in person tonight, at 7pm go to the City web site >>> Quick links (bottom left) >>> City Council Meeting Agendas and Documents >>> “View Live Stream City Council Meeting” at the top of the page.

On that same page you can find the agenda for the meeting, any pertinent documents for the meeting – and, for later reference, the print version of the minutes plus audio and video recordings of the meeting.

Or

You can also go to YouTube at <City of Bethlehem Council> for live-stream and archiving.

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

Christmas tales

Gadfly is always a bit worried that “comments” to posts get lost by the WordPress format, which sort of renders them almost invisible.

So I’m raising Peter Crownfield’s comment to Stephen Antalics’ recent “Have Bethlehem’s holiday lights lost their original purpose of unity?” post to top-level here because  it is really striking. Gadfly doesn’t want it to get lost.

Here’s what Peter said:

Definitely missing an opportunity to have a more unified display. There may be some historic justification for white lights in the Moravian area, but people have pointed out many times that the use of all white lights north of the river and all colored lights south of the river is seen by many as a racist scheme.

And, in similar vein, Gadfly #1 Antalics also wrote me this recently:

I questioned a number of bus drivers who acted as tour guides and some local individuals dressed as Moravians [Gadfly is not sure whether this is recent or back c. 2000 when the article was published] and the comments of quite a few were that the colored lights of the Southside represented the pagan origins of Christmas (red and green were pagan color schemes) and the white lights of North Bethlehem represented the purity of the birth of Christ. Really!! I could not find my socks.

Are these Christmas tales from the dark side?

 

Bethlehem Moment 8: Operation Book Move

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

Bethlehem Moment 8

BM Beighe
Ed and Eleanor Beighe

City Council
March 19, 2019

Barbara Diamond, 425 Center Street

A Bethlehem Moment: November 11, 1967

For 43 years Bethlehem’s Public Library served the community from its location on the corner of Market and New Streets (currently occupied by Moravian Academy Middle School), but by the mid-1960’s the library had outgrown this circa 1860s home. With the potential for a $500,000 federal library construction grant, Bethlehem Globe-Times publisher Rolland Adams offered a gift of $250,000 provided it was matched by private contributions. City Council also pledged $500,000 if the gifts and other funds were forthcoming. With that the city launched a fundraising drive, and within one month the citizens of Bethlehem pledged over $292,000. Construction of the new library commenced on August 17, 1965, and was completed two years and three months later.

At 9:00 am on Saturday, November 11, 1967, a singular event of civic participation occurred when the community again stepped up to support their library.  “Operation Book Move” was a massive effort to physically move 80,000 books and hundreds of periodicals from the old library at the corner of Market and New Streets to our current library on Church Street.

JayceesPic1
Students enjoying carrying the books!

The move was planned and coordinated by librarian Amy Preston and the Jaycees under the leadership of committee chairs Ed Beighe and John Horvath. A call went out for volunteers to assist in this massive task; the response was overwhelming. Seven hundred members of the community answered, among them boy scouts and girl scouts, high school students, Lehigh fraternities, Beta Sigma Phi Sorority, Trinity Church Youth, the Bethlehem Woman’s, Sertoma, Key, and MORA Clubs, the Junior League, AAUW, Lehigh and Bethlehem Steel’s Libraries, and many private individuals. Seven crews working four three-hour shifts were planned with the expectation that the move would take 12 hours, but by 4:00 the job was done.

Volunteers, some as young as 12, packed books into cartons. Another crew formed a line to move the cartons down a waxed ramp over the steps into large hampers and then onto a flatbed truck for transport to the new library. Another human chain of Lehigh fraternity men moved cartons of bound periodicals from the basement of the old library to the second floor of the new library. According to librarian Preston, all 30,000 books in the children’s library were moved in two hours, many by the children themselves. “We chose to send the heavy encyclopedias and oversize books, the odd sizes and shapes with the walking groups. Some could carry only one or two books at the most. But everyone was in good humor about it.”

By all accounts, Operation Book Move was an enormous success and a wonderful tribute to the people of Bethlehem who stepped up to support their library. This proud moment of civic engagement says a lot about Bethlehem of that day. When people care about their community they are motivated to participate; to give their time, attention and other support for its benefit. That so many people stepped up to perform this important community task suggests a high level of community cohesion. The nature of the project itself motivated public support. Institutions like the library that broadly benefit the community are unifying forces that can bring people together and enhance cohesion and civic engagement. In this time of partisanship and disengagement, we could use more such opportunities.

Many thanks to Bethlehem Area Public Library for access to resources used in this Bethlehem Moment.

————————

“Library Move Planned to the Last Book,” Morning Call, November 1, 1967.

“Shelves of Public Library are Bare,” Morning Call, November 9, 1967.

“Volunteers Put Muscle into Library Moving Day,” Bethlehem Globe-Times, November 11, 1967.

“Bethlehem Library Ends 43-Year Location,” Morning Call, November 13, 1967.

“Hill to Hill,” Morning Call, November 13, 1967.

“Book Moving Project Ends, More Volunteers Needed,” Bethlehem Gobe-Times, November 13, 1967.

“Bethlehem Library Opened for Public,” Morning Call, November 21, 1967.

“Bethlehem’s New Library Ready For Public,” Morning Call, November 24, 1967.

(Beighe photo credit, Douglas Graves, Bethlehem Press)

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

Irrelevant information

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

Bill Scheirer is an economist who grew up in Bethlehem, spent 40 years in DC, and retired here in 2003. He is a life member of the Committee of 100 on the Federal City, and was on the Mayor’s Task Force for the City of Bethlehem Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Zoning Map.

Gadfly:

Donald Rumsfeld was known for saying that there are things we know we know, things we know we don’t know, and things we don’t know we don’t know. I would like to suggest that the things we know we know can be meaningfully broken down into two groups: things we know that are relevant, and things we know that are not. Two examples come to mind.

The first concerns 2 West Market Street. We heard that it was impossible to obtain a mortgage to buy the property because it had both a residence and three little commercial buildings. We were told the buyer of the property mortgaged other properties to buy the property. Why was this a problem? Did the buyer want to consolidate mortgages? Did the buyer want to make it easier to sell some day? If one or both of these were a problem, why wasn’t the lot subdivided to end the mixed use? I have been told subsequently that this would have required variances. But isn’t that a milder remedy than amending the zoning ordinance? Shouldn’t milder remedies be pursued as a matter of policy in preference to more drastic remedies like amending an ordinance? But this, of course, would not have satisfied the objective of the wealth management firm, which was to enter a historic district and convert a residence into an office building. In other words, the mortgage problem was an irrelevant excuse to enable a rezoning.

A second example of irrelevant knowledge was in the discussion about raising parking meter rates. We heard that other cities, including Reading and Harrisburg as I recall, had raised their rates from $1.00 to $1.50 per hour. Now it is possible that these cities knew something we didn’t on this matter, which isn’t very likely. And we certainly don’t compete with them. And we don’t compete that much with downtown Allentown or Easton. Out real competitors are the malls. And their parking rates are zero. So we ended up by putting our downtown merchants at a further disadvantage vis-a-vis the malls. Why did we do this? The only real answer was that it was done to raise money for new and/or renovated garages. This, of course, should benefit our downtown businesses. This is kind of like “no pain, no gain”. But in this case the pain is permanent.

Clear thinking requires all of us, myself included, to more carefully weigh all information, and decide which is relevant and which is not.

Bill

(See under topics on the Gadfly sidebar for the long threads on 2 W. Market and parking. City Council approved 2 W. Market for business purposes, and the Mayor approved the Bethlehem Parking Authority request to increase the parking meter rate.)

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

Have Bethlehem’s holiday lights lost their original purpose of unity?

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

Reference yesterday’s Gadfly post on the meeting Tuesday 5-7PM, Banana Factory, with a design consultant on Bethlehem’s Christmas lights schema.

Reprinted as it originally appeared in the Morning Call, December 3, 2000.

ANOTHER VIEW: Have Bethlehem’s holiday lights lost their original purpose of unity?

At 5:30 p.m, on Dec. 17, 1937, the citizens of the City of Bethlehem witnessed an event that was to forever alter the nature of the city. At that precise moment, Mrs. Eugene Gifford Grace pulled a switch at Hotel Bethlehem, thus illuminating the entire city and designating it officially as “The Christmas City.” All streets within the shopping districts north and south of the Lehigh River were uniformly bedecked with garlands of colored lights, with the centerpiece being a massive 40 foot tree decorated with white lights at the rotary of the Hill-to-Hill Bridge.

Vernon K. Melhado, a Sephardic Jew and a 1920 immigrant to the United States from England and then Jamaica, was appointed in 1937 as chairman of the Bethlehem Chamber of Commerce. He was very active in civic and social causes, vigorously promoting and supporting the Boy’s Club and the Salvation Army. Being sensitive to ethnic and religious bigotry, he became acutely aware of the divisions within the city carried over by the lingering animosities and distrust left from the old borough mentality. Thus, he devised a plan of social and ethnic unification of both areas north and south of the river. This plan included the unified lighting scheme. Mrs Grace, a native of Bethlehem who was also aware of the divisions within the city, became a staunch supporter.

The inscription on the monument in the city park at Eighth Avenue and Union Boulevard gives a bit of background and underscores the brillianace of his plan. The story is particularly timely today, as Bethlehem once again begins the yule season.

“The first house was built early in the year 1741. On December 24, 1741, the settlement was named “Bethlehem” by Count Zinzendorf. Until January 11, 1844, this was an exclusive Moravian settlement, in which none but members of the Moravian Church were allowed to hold real estate. The village was incorporated as a borough on March 5, 1845.”

The portent of this statement is that the Borough of Bethlehem was to continue according to the wishes of the original congregation. This kept the borough a quiet, residential community. This was in sharp contrast to what was to become of the farms south of the river, large areas which were owned by the congregation. This land was sold off to various entrepreneurial individuals, who soon changed this community into a “boom town.”

It drew its vast labor force from non-English speaking immigrants from central and eastern Europe, a group whose customs and behavior were in sharp contrast to the gentrified citizens of Borough of Bethlehem.

Citizens of the Borough of Bethlehem who considered themselves to be “Native Americans” viewed these “unwashed” who lived in “Shanty Town” as “foreign invaders.” These attitudes fostered mutual distrust and animosities between the two boroughs.An elder of the congregation summed the differences by stating:

“Where once the Pilgrim Congregation went forth, “their feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace’ today stands the thriving city of steel. These grounds hallowed by the incarnation of the Invisible Church have been defiled by the smoke and sordidness of American industry. The rule of Spangenberg has given way to the rule of Schwab; and Bethlehem, though it cherishes its religious origins as the seat of Moravianism, now lives on steel.”

The borough of South Bethlehem in 1913 was granted third class city status, reverted back to being a borough and eventually, the industrial and business community began to promote unification of the two boroughs. Using World War I as rationale, they mounted a campaign based upon a patriotic theme, claiming that a united city, could best support the war effort. So, in 1917, the two boroughs were joined, not based upon principles of brotherly love, but rather a patriotic theme that overshadowed the deeper, underlying sense of mutual distrust and animosity.

All of this shows the brilliance of Mr. Melhado and Mrs. Grace in defining “The Christmas City.” The visible symbol of this unity was the city-wide uniform lighting scheme. This annual lighting continued for a number of years, waned in the mid 1960s, and was severely cut back during the national energy crisis of 1973. The following year, the lights were back. Various schemes had been implemented, prompting a local paper to run in 1977 a survey as to the preferred scheme. The consensus was that uniform colored lights were preferred. The scheme of recent years reflects the white lights of the north side of the city and colored lights on the South Side.

Various members of the city government and civic groups said “it was traditional that the colored lights of the South Side reflected its ethnic heritage, along with the historic white lights of the north side.” Many visitors, when asked, felt that the lighting differences represented two different communities. Christmas lighting is handled by the Christmas City Commission, but now there is a Southside Lighting Committee. There is now the South Bethlehem Historic Conservation Commission, while there is also Historic Bethlehem. Is this a subtle return to the old borough mentality?

Gregory Farrington, the president of Lehigh University, very astutely observed that an “Intellectual Iron Curtain” isolated it from the South Side, and took immediate strong and decisive action to integrate the school into the community. Might the city’s leaders follow this gesture and reinstall that profound symbol of city unity, the uniform Christmas lights of 1937, thereby protecting the city from lapses into the old borough mentality of ethnic and social differences and discrimination?

Stephen C. Antalics Jr. is a resident of Bethlehem’s South Side.

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

Bethlehem’s H.D.: an artistic vision that counters the dismissal of women as spiritual leaders (13)

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey

(13th in a series of posts on H.D.)

We continue to learn about this Bethlehem-born writer (1886-1961), the “Lehigh Valley’s most important literary figure,” as the plaque at the entrance announces to our library patrons.

Finding H.D.: A Community Exploration of the Life and Work of Hilda Doolittle

The next event in this year-long series is a panel discussion on “H.D. and the Natural World,” Tuesday, April 16, 6:30-8:00pm at the Bethlehem Area Public Library.

We’ve done three posts on Prof. Mary Foltz’s lecture on “Challenging Limited Understandings of Gender and Sexuality” on March 6, and now we’re ready to look at a fourth slice. Here’s the full audio of this fourth section and below are selected sound bites from Mary’s prepared text.

Listening to Mary undeniably best; you know that Gadfly always says go to the primary source.

Remember that in the previous post, Mary focused on the formative awareness the young H.D. had in Nisky Hill cemetery as described in The Gift: “when the young Hilda seemingly only finds the names of women preserved on gravestones, she is gesturing to the absence of familial, cultural, and national recognition of women’s value.”

Now think along with Mary and the audience after you read the following passages and ask yourself: 1) How is women’s labor described in these two passages? 2) How is the father’s labor described? 3) How do you understand the separate spheres for men and women in the family and larger community?

H.D. 7
“Women’s labor in Hilda’s home is child-rearing, creating activities for the children (art projects, etc.), sweeping and other forms of cleaning, and caring for the larger family. Mary 1Working class white women here belong to a house, they are tied in servitude to pleasing affluent white men, women and children. Her father belongs to the world and his work matters to the world as journalists, students, and other researchers value his contributions. The young Hilda here, despite her youthful ambition to be an artist, does not have in The Gift examples of women from her family who have succeeded in the outside world or whose work has been valued beyond their labor to support husbands and children. Of course, Hilda, this young queer child, has ambition in The Gift beyond becoming a wife alone and in particular is invested in becoming an artist.”

But women artists are mocked too, not only in society at large but within her own family. Look at the devastating effect her father’s perhaps unwitting denigration of her mother’s singing has on the mother as well as the young H.D., for whom her mother is model. This incident cuts Gadfly deeply.

Min. 5:25 ff.

H.D. 11

Min. 7:55

“Toward the end of The Gift, H.D. commits herself to offering an artistic vision that counters the dismissal of women as artists and thinkers, but also as spiritual leaders, Mary 2providing insight into how communities might fight against sexism, racism, and violence in the world. The closing of the text allows her to recall a message from her Mamalie when she was a child and Mamalie began to lose her grasp on the present in her old age. Mamalie drifts back to a time when she learned about “papers” or deerskin document that told of rituals on wound island in Monocacy creek, during the time in which women were valued as spiritual leaders, when Christ was seen as feminine and masculine, when the holy spirit is understood as feminine. H.D. gives us these memories of Mamalie’s story and glimpses of what occurred on wound island before the sifting time in fits and starts and it never becomes fully clear to the reader what the exact rituals on Wound Island might be.”

H.D. 9

“What is clear is that the rituals involve women in leadership roles, a sharing of indigenous religious belief and Moravian religious belief, and the understanding of sacred femininity as part of the divine. Here, H.D. reminds readers of the massacre of Mary 3Lenni Lenape indigenous people who share pacifist religious beliefs with Moravian missionaries that they encountered. Nearly 100 Lenape were murdered by a white militia led by Lt. Colonel David Williamson in retaliation for raids in PA, in which the group of Lenni Lenape had not participated. Mamalie and H.D. here contrast this horrendous massacre with the ritual at Wound Island where indigenous and white people honor their religious traditions together, where domination of one group of men over another is not sought, but challenged, where domination of women by men is not seen as natural but challenged by divine spirit. As white masculinity in her childhood community is believed to be superior and is supported by exploiting women’s labor and by the removal and domination of indigenous populations, H.D. takes readers back to a time in Bethlehem when religious ritual actively fought against such forms of domination.”

Min. 14:45

H.D. 10

“Sexism, racism, and homophobia are part of this problem of violence as specific groups of men write their superiority across the sky with powerful bombs, pounding their Mary 4power and strength into the ground, onto the bodies, of those that they see as disposable, as waste. But at Wound Island, where men can let go of a masculinity that erects itself in its divine difference from simple woman, where European immigrant men can let go of their need to dismiss their spiritual insights of groups different from them, where men can contemplate exploring their own femininity, their own vulnerability, their love for other men, H.D. places her hope. In Bethlehem’s past, there was a place on an island where the fantasy of superiority was seen as sin, and the divine feminine and masculine merged, when women were valued as equal as men, when indigenous and European came together to share their beliefs and to delight in the sacred value of each body.”

Now pause for a moment. Tug at the edges of your hat with both hands. Tighten your belt. Hike your socks. Mary ends in a breath-taking rhetorical gallop.

“It will be the work of lesbian, gender non-conforming, and bisexual women at the end of The Gift to reach into the historical archive to show the value of sacred foremothers. It Mary 5will be the work of lesbian, gender non-conforming, bisexual and feminist women to create works of art that provide beehives of words that readers can visit, in which we can live as we build communities in which diverse women can thrive. It will be the work of all of us in all our many genders, sexualities, to engage with the language that devalues others and celebrates the few, structures that benefit the few while exploiting the many. We, too, are asked to create new narratives and structures that might challenge violence in the world, as we attempt to address  sexism, racism, homophobia, biphobia, transphobia, in our communities.”

Trumpet flourish!

Remember: the next event in this year-long series is a panel discussion on “H.D. and the Natural World,” Tuesday, April 16, 6:30-8:00pm at the Bethlehem Area Public Library.

Take the “Connecting Bethlehem” survey